display driver uninstaller download version 15.4.0.0

#Display driver uninstaller download version 15.4.0.0 drivers#
#Display driver uninstaller download version 15.4.0.0 Patch#

I am not sure what the exact statistics are, but I am sure that the millions of freelancers and small studios out there, out weigh the larger studios that can afford M6000’s in their workstations and render nodes, so this would be a very bad business move from Nvidia.ĭoes anyone else know of any benchmarks in iray comparing the Titan X to the M6000? Hopefully this benchmark is wrong, but I would not put it past Nvidia to do this.Īnyone upgraded their old titan with a new Titan X and run benchmarks against new and old to see what the time improvements are?Īs if the O&G industry has the budget for that right now (it doesn't). Freelancers and studios will just stick to their older Titans. I am not going to spend an extra $19300 (£12900) on what is essentially the same GPU’s just because Nvidia want to force people to buy Quadro’s by crippling performance in Iray, so if the benchmark is not a rotten egg, and Nvidia have crippled the Desktop Maxwell cards in iray, they have lost my money this time round, and I’m sure tens of millions of other potential sales. The majority of freelancers and small studios cant afford it, so if Nvidia are crippling the Titan X in iray, I am sure Nvidia will end up loosing tens of millions in sales from potential new sales / upgrades from people like me, once the word gets around. If this is the case, that Nvidia have decided to cripple Maxwell desktop cards in iray to force people to buy their extortionate Quadro cards, then I for one will not be upgrading.ĭo Nvidia think that freelancers like me are going to spend around $24500 ( £16400 ) on Quadro cards instead of approx $5200 (£3500) on Titan X‘s? The Iray test should have very similar results to the Blender / Octane / RatGPU and Luxmark tests, with the Titan X slightly faster than the M6000 because of the higher clock rates. Two, Nvidia are purposefully crippling Desktop Maxwell GPU’s in Iray to promote their Quadro Cards! Nvidia Develop Iray, so can cannot manipulate the results in Blender or Octane, only in Iray they can do this because they make the GPU’s and the software. One that the test is a rotten egg and needs to be performed again in 3ds max 2016,

#Display driver uninstaller download version 15.4.0.0 Patch#

The Maxwell Patch must have been applied otherwise the Quadro and Titan X would not work in 3ds Max at all.

#Display driver uninstaller download version 15.4.0.0 drivers#

It cannot be about crippled drivers like the GTX 680, otherwise the Blender and Octane results would be exactly the same with the M6000 3x faster, but the results for Blender Octane etc are as expected with the Titan X a little faster than the M6000 because of the higher clock rates. The Quadro M6000 and Titan X are essentially exactly the same GPU, with exactly the same estimated single precision performance at 7 Tflops, so this does not explain why the M6000 is 3x faster than the Titan X in the iray benchmark, while the other single precision benchmarks show the Titan X being faster than the M6000?

The benchmark’s for Iray do not make sense? I cant post the link here, so just type tomshardware dot de, M6000, Titan X in google search and you will find it at the top. I was thinking about upgrading my 4x GTX Titan’s (2688 core) to 4x GTX Titan X for rendering with Iray, until I saw benchmarks on TomsHardware Germany.